A fantastic album all around. The whole thing is on Pandora, but I’m not aware of a full-album YouTube playlist or video. Let me know if you find one, and I’ll update this post.
“Infinite Fire” by Flying Colors. I only learned about the band today, although it features some musicians I know and love from other bands (including Neal Morse and Mike Portnoy). This track is a prog mini-epic, clocking in at only twelve minutes. But I can summarize it in one word: Wow!
There are also lots of live versions on YouTube just waiting to pop up in your search results.
(By the way, why are so many prog musicians named “Morse”?)
A truly enjoyable academic paper looking at emoji usage in freeform text on GitHub (not reactions). I found this while trying to find out when GitHub introduced the :rocket: and :eyes: reactions. (Does anybody know? It’s not jumping out at me.) Happy reading!
In Word VBA, calling
doc.Paragraphs(idx) to get a paragraph by its index is very slow. Instead, once you have a
Paragraph object, use
para.Previous to navigate, and your code will be much faster! I just refactored an old routine this way and received a dramatic speedup.
doc.Paragraphs() must be iterating through the document starting from the beginning, but I don’t know that for sure. I do know that adding paragraphs before the region my code was working with made the code run perceptibly slower, even though the code was never touching the added paragraphs.
Here are some simple helpers, in case you want to manually check for errors rather than throwing when you run off the end of the document:
Private Function NextParaOrNothing_(p As Paragraph) As Paragraph Set NextParaOrNothing_ = Nothing On Error Resume Next Set NextParaOrNothing_ = p.Next End Function 'NextParaOrNothing_ Private Function PrevParaOrNothing_(p As Paragraph) As Paragraph Set PrevParaOrNothing_ = Nothing On Error Resume Next Set PrevParaOrNothing_ = p.Previous End Function 'PrevParaOrNothing_
And now for something even more completely different. All opinions herein are my own and not necessarily those of any other party. If you don’t like this one, just hold on — another Cheese of the Day is next on my list to post 🙂 .
The recent Federal government shutdown took the livelihoods of 800,000 employees. In three weeks, those people may again be without pay — and many forced to work for free. This is tyranny, and must be prevented.
The State legislatures have the power to protect their citizens from this Federal abuse. Please ask your legislators to apply to Congress for a Federal Constitutional Convention that will pass amendments protecting government employees from future shutdowns.
Under the U.S. Constitution, Congress must call a Convention if two thirds of the States request one (Article V). Where the Federal government is unable to act, the States can compel action. A Federal Constitutional Convention can restore the lives of Federal employees and prevent them from being bargaining chips in future policy debates.
I propose two amendments to the U.S. Constitution with respect to the shutdown, and one amendment to update the amendment process itself. The text and rationale of each proposal is below. The two shutdown-related amendments are, in brief:
No person shall be forced to work without pay.
This article does not apply to, and shall be disregarded in any consideration of, any prisoner of war, any person serving a sentence, or any minor.
Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.
Section 1: Everyone’s work is valuable and should be rewarded. Forcing people to work without pay degrades them, creates unhealthy work environments, and — in some cases — causes unsafe situations. This puts all of us at risk.
Section 2: We have specific laws and international agreements for the treatment of prisoners of war, convicted criminals, and minors. Those have developed over many years, and I think it is worth letting them continue to develop. This section makes clear that this amendment does not affect that development.
Any appropriation by a government for the wages or benefits of a government employee shall continue in force until expressly rescinded by appropriate legislation. Any such appropriation specifying a period of validity shall automatically renew as often as necessary, without gaps in effect, until expressly rescinded by appropriate legislation.
No law or regulation shall prevent a government from incurring debt to pay for the wages or benefits of a government employee.
Sections 1 and 2 shall not apply to any appropriation that is for neither employee wages nor employee benefits, regardless of whether that appropriation is included in a bill or other legislative action that also includes an appropriation for employee wages or benefits.
This article applies to appropriations in force on or after December 1, 2018.
The term “government” in this Article refers to the government of the United States, to the governments of the several States, and to all governments established under the laws of the United States or of any State.
The legislative body of each government shall have the power to enforce this article with respect to that government’s employees by appropriate legislation.
Section 1: This prevents government employees from becoming bargaining chips. Whatever happens, their wages and benefits will still be paid. By extending the appropriation, the payment of wages and benefits remains authorized under the Constitution, Art. 1, sec. 9, clause 7, and the Antideficiency Act, 31 USC 1341.
Many existing appropriations are annual. This section expressly specifies automatic renewal rather than elimination of the end date of an appropriation so existing accounting can still be used.
Section 2: Government debt is a significant problem. However, I believe that the livelihoods of the government’s employees are more important. So that future shutdowns will not harm employees, governments need to be able to get the money to pay them. This section only applies to wages and benefits of government employees — any current debt ceilings remains in place for everything else.
Section 3: This is to prevent people from adding unrelated riders to wage-appropriation bills.
Section 4: This section is specific to the current situation. If a shutdown is in progress when this amendment is enacted, this section will restore wages to what they were before the most recent shutdown.
Section 5: If this article only applied to Federal workers, State- and local-government employees would still be at risk. This closes that potential loophole: all wage appropriations continue until expressly rescinded, regardless of the level of government. However, an amendment only relating to the Federal government would still be better than the present situation!
Section 6: Since this amendment affects all levels of government, all levels of government need the power to implement this amendment appropriately for their situations.
(a) Amendments to the Constitution may be proposed by:
(b) Amendments shall be valid to all intents and purposes, as part of this Constitution, when ratified by three fourths of the several States.
(c) A State’s decision on ratification of an Amendment shall be made by that State’s legislature or by another ratifying body authorized by that State’s constitution. No State’s ratifying body may include fewer people than the number of members of that State’s legislature.
(d) No State, without its consent, shall be deprived of its equal suffrage in the Senate.
The fifth Article of the original Constitution is hereby repealed. This Article has the same intent as the fifth Article of the original Constitution.
Section 1: This modernizes the amendment process and grants States more flexibility, without changing the basic thresholds of 2/3 and 3/4.
Item (a)(3) permits the States to convene a Federal Constitutional Convention without Congressional involvement. I believe this is a reasonable balance to the increase in Congressional power over the last 70 years. This is also much easier than it would have been when the Constitution was passed, since communications and travel between States is dramatically faster. The requirement for public notice in this item prevents the danger of a secret Convention.
Item (c) lets each State choose its own mode of ratifying amendments. The conditions of each State are different, so each State deserves the opportunity to choose. This also parallels the States’ freedom in the way they choose members of the Electoral College. Although the State’s Legislature is the default, States could also choose to ratify in convention or by referendum. The requirement on the minimum size of the ratifying body is so that one person cannot make the decision for an entire State.
Section 2: We only need one amendment process. I think it is clearer to replace the old than to try to specify the new language by changes. Section 1(d) retains the requirement that States continue to have equal Suffrage in the Senate. Therefore, this Section is permissible under Art. 5.
The Federalist #85 deals with amendments, and I see nothing therein that would give rise to an objection to Section 1. To avoid doubt, the section specifies continuity of intent with the original Art. 5.
The beginning of a new series of posts! East Hill Creamery Underpass Reserve. It’s delicious! Sharp, but not overwhelmingly so, crumbly. Edible rind, although I prefer the paste. By the way, the non-reserve is also good, especially melted. Much milder.
This is not a paid review — I am pretty sure East Hill Creamery doesn’t even know I exist 🙂 .